Latest Postings

 
 


APEC Summit and US moves to put “allies” in the front lines of conflict

(Contributed)

The recent Asia-Pacific Economic Co-operation (APEC) summit in Papua New Guinea provided the expected confrontation between US-led western allies and China. It was the outcome of months of the former engaging in high-level, tense diplomacy, toward China.
 
The rapid rise of China has been assessed by US-led western allies to have threatened traditional hegemonic positions, particularly in the South Pacific.

Two other developments, however, timed to coincide with the summit, would appear to throw light upon coordinated diplomatic activity by US-led western allies; their waves of militarism in the Asia-Pacific region are linked with similar planning for Europe.
 
The recent APEC summit in PNG included what was described in diplomatic talk as a 'tense exchange' between US vice-president Mike Pence and China's President Xi Jinping. (1) It was to be expected following months of a US-led rising tide of militarism and hostile diplomacy toward China, largely played out over PNG, a dominant country in the South Pacific. The US-led position is best described as bellicosity using Cold War rhetoric, a departure from usual diplomacy.

The APEC summit also concluded with what was described in official media releases as, 'a bitter clash between the US and China over trade, which resulted in a joint communique not being signed for the first time in 25 years'. (2) The development followed an attempt by four Chinese officials to seek private talks with PNG Foreign Minister Rimbink Pato, which resulted in an intervention by security personnel, who then escorted the officials away from the ministry. (3)

The fact that PNG has formed a significant part of the Defence of Australia (DOA) doctrine since the end of the Second World War has drawn Australia closely into the fray. The DOA is based on US-led military planning to protect the northern shores of Australia from possible invasion, and has also included the Solomon Islands and Vanuatu. The three South Pacific countries have, in recent times, developed close diplomatic links with China. Diplomatic links between Beijing and Port Moresby have become particularly close. The diplomatic position adopted by China in recent times has described PNG as 'truly a land of great promise'. (4)

The rapid rise of China as a world power has been assessed by the US as a threat to their traditional hegemonic position, in the South Pacific and elsewhere. The US now has to consider China as a credible competitor when dealing with leaders in areas regarded by the Pentagon as falling under their tutelage, such as the South Pacific. The US hegemonic position in the region has always been conducted through Australia, as a dominant regional hub for 'US interests'. It is, therefore, no surprise to find Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison describing the South Pacific as 'our patch'. (5)

The role of Australia toward 'our patch' in the South Pacific has historically been paved with good intentions but very little else. While strategically important for Australia, the countries were provided with little practical support to develop their own economies. Even today, after producing vast profits for Australian-based mining companies, their economic plight remains dire; they have been pillaged and plundered by neo-colonialism. PNG has an average income of only $4,200 per head of population, the Solomon Islands has $3,000 per head, Vanuatu, $4,500 per head. The figures, however, are grossly misleading; vast differences between wealth and poverty exist side by side with the majority of the populations having little more than subsistence living standards. 

The involvement of China in economic development programs has usually been aimed toward longer-term planning and modernity. China claims that it will eventually enable the countries to build stronger, independent economies. It is, therefore, not difficult to understand the role of US-led resistance to the role of China in the South Pacific.

The present US-led position toward China is based on military planning which includes real-war scenarios.

The US military planning has, in recent years, been adapted to also include Japan as a northern regional hub for 'US interests', in a triangular diplomatic relationship with the US and Australia. Its main defence and security focus has been encircling China and attempting to contain influences assessed as threatening traditional hegemonic positions.

The recent visit of Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe to Australia immediately prior to the APEC summit was not coincidental. Abe conducted high-level diplomacy with his Australian counterpart, Morrison. Official media releases explained the meetings which took place as 'pursuing deeper and broader defence cooperation, including joint exercises, strategic visits, trilateral cooperation with the US and further sharing of defence equipment, science and technology'. (6)

Two other developments have to also be considered:

Almost hidden in official media releases was the next planned wave of US-led militarism set to sweep the Asia-Pacific region from early next year. During the recent high-level diplomacy between Abe and Morrison, it was noted 'for the first time a date for completion of their Reciprocal Access Agreement: early next year' was planned. (7) The planned agreement appears to be the equivalent of a Status of Forces agreement, 'its purpose is to allow much greater and easier military cooperation and joint exercises between Japan and Australia'. (8)

The high-level diplomacy between Japan and Australia, however, followed what was later described as 'intense negotiations', conducted between joint defence and foreign ministers in October, which were not publicised at the time. (9) There has been little left to the imagination: it has already been noted in official Defence Department media releases, that, 'Australia and Japan are expected to agree to hold larger joint military exercises more often'. (10)

The moves also include Australian proposals for convening 'an annual summit for heads of Pacific security forces in Canberra', to strengthen regional diplomacy. (11) The annual forums are likely to include further intelligence-gathering and sharing, conducted through US-led military facilities.

What the status of the newly proposed naval facilities of Manus Island play with the military planning, therefore, remain unclear. The proposed facilities have a highly strategic position, facing the Pacific Ocean. While addressing the APEC summit vice-president Pence stated the US was planning to contribute toward the expansion of the Manus Island facilities. It was noted they include a strategically vital deep-water port, a sweeping command of Australian maritime approaches and are, 'big enough to accommodate aircraft carriers, and have anchorage capacity for hundreds of ships'. (12) It was also noted that 'the nearby airport could also be used for surveillance flights'. (13)

Discussion, within PNG, however, would indicate some controversy is already taking place within the corridors of power in Port Moresby. A recent media release 'prompting a warning from Manus governor Charlie Benjamin', about whether it would be used to advance the Australian position without consultation, for example, provide evidence the military planning was foisted upon PNG from US-led levels. (14) Decision-makers in PNG, it would appear, were merely expected to follow directives.

Secondly, an announcement from French President Emmanuel Macron about the creation of a European army with 'European leaders to take more responsibility for their defence and security', together with the establishment of a European intelligence agency, received scant media attention in Australia. (15) Due to the historical links between the US and western European countries, it would appear highly unlikely the proposed European army would be independent of US military planning. A more likely scenario being a possible US reduction in European-based military personnel and defence funding.

Both developments, in the South Pacific and Europe, carry a common strand: the US is seemingly distancing itself from future large-scale military ventures and moving toward a position where regional hubs will be front-line forces. US military planners, based in the Pentagon, will continue to be engaged in exercises, war-games and likely real-war scenarios, but expect allies to make a bigger contribution to the defence and security of 'US interests'.

The moves are the outcome of two considerations:

The US is faced with financial constraints which increase, year by year. Secondly, the mind-set of dominant figures within the military-industrial complex remains based in a 'permanent war complex', where military operations serve the interests of the corporate sector. (16)
It is not difficult to find evidence to support the two considerations: a recent paper from the Canberra-based Lowy Institute International Security Program noted, for example, recent US diplomacy has been based on a, 'worthy initiative to an American agenda that is high on ambitious rhetoric but low on substance'. (17)

The Australian people should not allow this charade to continue to its logical conclusion:

We require an independent foreign policy before the real-war scenarios begin!

1.     Cold War in the Pacific, The New Daily, 17 November 2018.
2.     China hits back with barley sales probe, Australian, 20 November 2018.
3.     China sparks APEC standoff, Australian, 19 November 2018.
4.     China v. US in the Pacific comes to a head in Port Moresby, The Weekend Australian, 17-18 November 2018.
5.     Ibid.
6.     Japanese PM set to visit sub war grave, Australian, 13 November 2018.
7.     Morrison walks fine line between powers and does fine job, The Weekend Australian, 17-18 November 2018.
8.     Ibid.
9.      Alliance to test China in Pacific,The Weekend Australian, 17-18 November 2018.
10.    Atonement, Top End Style, Australian, 13 November 2018.
11.    Allies join forces for standoff with China, Australian, 19 november 2018.
12.    Australia 'top PNG security partner', Australian, 9 November 2018.
13.   Australian, op.cit., 20 November 2018.
14.   Warning over Manus navy hub, Australian, 20 November 2018.
15.   Macron's move to make Europe responsible for its own security, Australian, 20 November 2018.
16.   America's Permanent War Complex, The American Conservative, 15 November 2018.

 

APEC Summit and US moves to put “allies” in the front lines of conflict
Print Version - new window

APEC Summit and US moves to put “allies” in the front lines of conflict
Print Version - popup window

-----

Back to homepage

 

 

Articles

New report sheds light on lack of Australia’s independence in fuel supply and security

Agribusiness companies hit workers AND farmers!

For the environment and against the profit economy

Marxism Today: The legacy of Karl Marx

The relevance of Marx today

All eyes on Samoa

Universities increase profits at low-paid workers’ expense

Students show the way on climate change

Corporate media, Jacinta Price and Warren Mundine

Parliament shamed by anti-women bullies

Government to steal one thousand kids by 2022

APEC Summit and US moves to put “allies” in the front lines of conflict

Five picket lines win first pay rises for five years

Hidden wage theft: Another reason why we have to change the rules

Farmers of the world unite, call for intensified struggle vs. foreign plunder of land, state terror

 

-----

View more Articles

 

 
 
  Home | About Us | Marxism Today | Statements | International Documents | Articles | Links | Downloads | Search | Contact
Copyright © 2013 Vanguard - Communist Party of Australia Marxist Leninist