Enterprise Bargaining System Isolates Workers - Workers Want United Action
Written by: Ned K. on 3 April 2021
When the federal Labor Government under Hawke and Keating legislated in the early 1990s for Enterprise Agreements to become the main method for workers to protect and advance wages and conditions, the ACTU leaders at the time told workers it was the greatest thing since sliced bread.
IR Minister Laurie Brereton went one better and amended the industrial laws to enable employers to "negotiate" non-union Enterprise Agreements with workers on an individual workplace basis.
So, the new system not only facilitated a divided and conquer strategy across whole industries and even within individual companies with more than one workplace, but it enabled companies to accelerate their efforts to smash workers' collective strength through non-union Agreements.
Cartoonist Bruce Petty at that time more accurately summed up Enterprise Bargaining when his cartoon had the caption "Enterprise Bargaining - How To Stuff The Worker Completely"!
Future Governments after Keating had gone went even further through Work Choices and then the various forms of Fair Work Act termed “Work Choices Lite” by many workers.
Workers’ struggles continued despite the limited options to take strike action and there are examples right now of these courageous struggles which at the same time show the need to break through the shackles of enterprise specific bargaining.
For example, in Victoria McCormick food production workers have been on strike for over five weeks to defend conditions such as rostered days off and to break the company's five-year wage freeze, a real wage cut.
In NSW and SA, workers at Symbion Pharmaceuticals went on a 48-hour strike in pursuit of better conditions and a pay increase. This was the first strike action of these workers for many, many years. However, the workers under the Enterprise Bargaining system come under two separate Agreements. An example of divide and conquer within the one company.
Meanwhile in industries such as security, workers performing the same type of work across hundreds of worksites by multinational companies like MSS and Wilson Security are not able under the Fair Work Act to collectively bargain for even a company-wide Agreement let alone an industry or multi-employer Agreement.
The defenders of the Fair Work Act will cry out, "No this is not true, workers can negotiate a multi-employer or industry wide Agreement".
However, what they don't say is that the Fair Work Act, brought in by the ALP after Work Choices, does not allow workers to legally take ANY industrial action in pursuit of a multi-employer or industry wide Agreement.
Even in the State industrial relations jurisdictions, enterprise bargaining mirrors the federal system in that the major employer in the State systems, the State Governments, use the enterprise agreement system to divide and conquer.
So, we see the situation now in South Australia where ambulance officers, fire brigade workers, hospital workers are all fighting for safer workloads, increased staffing, shorter working hours and safe rosters and wage increases. However, each sector of these government workers has its own Enterprise Agreement.
Just before Easter break in South Australia, the ambulance officers/paramedics and the firies from the Metro[plitan Fire Services organised a stop work and rally and demonstration in the streets of Adelaide demanding increased staffing in particular for their own safety and for better service to the public.
Workers from all other areas of the public sector, including duty police at the demonstration who were clearly sympathetic to the demonstration's cause, joined the ambulance officers in solidarity.
Labor's mantra for the next Federal Election is that they stand with the people. Assuming they win the next federal parliamentary election, a mighty mass movement of workers will surely test them out.
One area of struggle that workers will put Labor under the microscope, if they are next government in Canberra, is to what extent Labor supports workers' right to struggle collectively across industries, across multiple employers and across the bosses' supply chains to defend and advance workers' collective interests.
Interesting times ahead!
Print Version - new window Email article
-----
Go back
Articles
The Pukpuk Australia-PNG mutual defence treaty and the wider US-led Indo-Pacific strategy |
Labor law used to intimidate and harass opponents of genocide |
Southern Launch protest rally speech by Derek Burke |
Tasmanian potato growers spitting chips |
Book Review: The New Age of Sexism |
Adelaide rally in support of Palestinians calls for action not words by Australian government |
Workers are revolting despite restrictions on strike action |
Tuvalu: global warming forces diplomatic reappraisal |
The uphill struggle to protect NSW’s Koalas |
We have strength to stop Israel’s participation in cycling’s Tour Down Under |
US company to profit from Ghost Shark contract |
Message from the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Burma on the 86th anniversary of its founding |
US-Chinese rivalry in Micronesia |
We welcome the call for a climate-based and more independent foreign policy. |
NT Government approves illegally built US fuel tanks |
Independence from both US and China is in the interests of Australia |
German comrades rally against Rheinmetall |
Sovereign Citizens: A few inconvenient home-truths for the centre-right |
Superpower rivalry and the Pacific Islands Forum |
Solidarity with the Panamanian workers |
-----