Whose is this “national interest”?
Written by: Ned K. on 23 October 2025
Prime Minister Albanese said that in his meeting with Trump in Washington D.C. his sole objective was to achieve the best outcome for "the national interest".
The "national interest" for Albanese on this occasion was hearing Trump say that he was committed to AUKUS and nuclear submarines in Australia and an agreement between the Australian and US governments on Australia providing the USA with rare earth minerals from Australia.
Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong has also used the term "national interest" in relation to the genocide of Palestinians by Israeli Government. She said it was in Australia's national interest to support the state of Israel as it was a "democracy" like Australia and had the right to "defend itself".
Both Albanese and Wong's use of the term "national interest" have been in relation to Australia's foreign affairs policies or strengthening military ties with the USA which they equate with making Australia a more secure place for people to live in.
Using their own logic, is it in Australia's "national interest" to ensure that our major airports and defence bases and naval bases are secure?
Albanese and Wong would agree that this is important.
However, the security of our airports, defence bases and naval bases are contracted out to multinational corporations whose allegiances and profits end up overseas.
The major security companies involved in airport, defence bases and naval bases are -
MSS Security - owned by an Indian multinational, SIS Limited
Securecorp - owned by China Security Co Ltd, based in Shenzhen, China
Certis Security - Singapore-owned
Wilson Security - owned by Sun Hung Kai Properties of the Kwok family
ISS - owned by a Danish based multinational
Secom Security- a Japanese owned company
Serco - UK owned
All of these multinational corporations are involved in cyber security and electronic surveillance services to governments and large corporations.
They came into existence and grew during the massive privatizations of security services all over the world including Australia under both Liberal and Labor branded governments.
This situation is just one example of how the use of the term "national interest" by this, and previous governments really means the interests, not of Australian people, but the foreign powers that governments serve.
Currently, that foreign power is US imperialism whose political interests at the moment are served by Trump, who Albanese now embraces as his friend and master.
Print Version - new window Email article
-----
Go back
Independence from Imperialism
People's Rights & Liberties
Community and Environment
Marxism Today
International
Articles
Whose is this “national interest”? |
Critical minerals deal: pulling the chain on Australian sovereignty. |
Whitehall and the Five Eyes: well, well, well, what 'ave we 'ere! |
The Pukpuk Australia-PNG mutual defence treaty and the wider US-led Indo-Pacific strategy |
Southern Launch protest rally speech by Derek Burke |
Tasmanian potato growers spitting chips |
US company to profit from Ghost Shark contract |
NT Government approves illegally built US fuel tanks |
Independence from both US and China is in the interests of Australia |
Foreign ownership of Australian dairy industry to intensify |
Australia and Japan pushed by US to further fund its Indo-Pacific ‘interests’ |
Demand for Australian independence grows as US is increasingly isolated |
AUKUS and the Australian American Leadership Dialogue |
Gifting another $800 million to AUKUS “partners” |
HIROSHIMA NEVER AGAIN! Five key demands for Hiroshima Day 2025 |
Did Albanese really champion Australian independence? |
Bunker-Buster Bomb Manufacturer to develop curriculum for SA Tech School |
The Eureka Initiative |
AUKUS reviews expose Australia’s secondary status |
Reject US military interference in Australia |
-----